No matter how much I focus my movie and TV watching, there’s just too much to catch in any given day. I’m constantly making tough choices on what to see, and other options fall by the wayside. Taking a business perspective, there’s essentially an opportunity cost to any decision. For example, I spent much of July watching the first season of Deadwood. I loved the show, but those 12 hours were used at the expense of something else. I could have spent that time seeing Boyhood or another promising new release. I’m currently watching Top of the Lake for the first time, and a DVD of Inside Llewyn Davis hasn’t found its way onto my screen. The ease of access is great, but there’s part of me that finds it constricting. The option paralysis leads to wasted moments figuring out what to do. It’s a silly complaint given the benefits, but it’s hard to escape. There’s no way to catch everything that we want to see, so prioritizing becomes a real challenge.
Here are some interesting blogs that are definitely worth your time:
Ryan McNeil from The Matinee and Jandy Hardesty of The Frame have started an intriguing series where they discuss the writings of critics included in the American Movie Critics anthology. Their latest post about Hugo Munstenberg goes into a lot more issues than his writing. I’m not familiar with him, so it’s great to see Ryan and Jandy taking his work and letting the discussion go from there. An example is their take on why films are so accessible and how it brings different classes together.
Looking in a different zone, I’ve grown concerned at signs that Disney World is changing for the worse. While their competitor Universal is opening Diagon Alley and a giant Transformers ride, Disney is focusing on ways to be “efficient” and get more revenue from guests. There are few signs this will change anytime soon. Tim Grassey at Micechat feels very similar and describes the situation in his piece “It’s Time for a Walt Disney World Renaissance”. It’s a measured and fair article that uses numbers to show that Disney is losing some guests and doesn’t seem willing to work to get them back into the fold.
The Blu-ray set “Twin Peaks: The Entire Mystery” was released last week, and its most exciting feature is 90 minutes of extra footage from Fire Walk with Me. Titled “The Missing Pieces”, the segments function like a separate movie and fill in some blanks. Joel Bocko provides his thoughts on them in a great post at Lost in the Movies. He’s a Twin Peaks fanatic and is the right person to dig into them and provide an interesting analysis. It’s an even-handed, well-written look at something that fans have wanted to see for a long time.
There were many insightful pieces written about Twin Peaks this week. One of the best comes from The Dissolve’s Keith Phipps, who delves into the show’s legacy including Fire Walk with Me. It’s a long post that does a great job explaining what worked and didn’t. It’s a perfect companion piece to Joel’s post because it only briefly touches on the new footage. Phipps brilliantly describes the “mystery made complete by its incompleteness” that keeps us fascinated by the show. I’ll close with an excerpt from his essay:
“I’ve never liked Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me, but even though I’d still rank it toward the bottom of my list of favorite David Lynch films—above Dune and Inland Empire—I’ve also spent more time watching, thinking about, and sorting out my feelings about it over the last 22 years than I’ve spent on more successful but less memorable films. It’s a frustrating movie, but one too strange and vibrant to dismiss, and too untidy to reshape into what we want it to be.”